Monday, January 22, 2007
A Little Rhiel Word Interaction
conservatism, intelligent conservatism, hate speech, hate talk, radio personalitites, free speech, fair use, copyright, Disney, ABC, KSFO,
Labels:
1st Amendment,
KSFO,
Spocko
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
I have been dying to put this shirt up. I should have a post to hang it on, but by this point .... well, if I have to, what hope is there? M...
-
Yesterday my template got corrupted - and it took me quite some time to diagnose why a blank screed was coming up. Obviously I have a lot of...
-
elephant, by Gay_Art Get this custom shirt at Zazzle BARBARA'S TCHATZKAHS : Bizarre Sex Habits of The Extreme Right-Wing It's prett...
-
Nearly a year ago, rob at "Sayanything" spoke predictably and thusly: Abortion Battle Raging By rob on July 20, 2005 at 11:0...
-
(raw story) Hope Steffey's night started with a call to police for help. It ended with her face down, naked, and sobbing on a jail cell ...
I feel a little caught in the middle here; as a Prog-Lib I've got feet in both camps. But I personally do draw a bright line at hate speech.
Indeed, making someone lose their brains and resort to the sorts of drooling lunacy served up as a regular diet on KSFO is to me a great big blue ribbon that says "I win." I mean, if you seriously suggest that "killing liberals" is a good idea, it pretty much means that their ideas are too dangerous to the the ideas you wished were true... but aren't.
I should add that I've seen this before. Vietnam era. Other side. Remember "baby killers" being screamed at returning draftees?
Same-same. This is the point where I stop listening, because if there's any truth buried in the crap - well, I hope I find it somewhere else, because life is too short to spend it having bile spat at me in anybody's cause.
Anyway, nobody is attacking their "free speech rights." They are attacking their right to be paid to speak, with the assumption of impunity.
Now, I know better.
And I also know there's not a single point made by KSFO that could not be made better by someone who wasn't using hate speech.
The moment you start attacking the person, instead of the idea, you have lost the argument. Everyone who doesn't already agree tunes out. Eventually, even those who agree become embarrassed to be associated with the viewpoint. And that political viewpoint, whatever it's validity, starts circling the drain.
And I see this as a serious problem. I don't LIKE the idea that there's nobody out there who can validly check my arguments. An honest argument on the merits of the case; that's a service to the American people. It's also good clean fun. But it's kinda like hockey. If you won't let the other team on the ice, it's just masturbation on skates - and after you've established that it can be done in the first place, I think most people lose interest rapidly.